This is an admission that they are intentionally misleading their readership about the nature of the information on that laptop. Even though an American person gave it to another American, who leaked it to an American newspaper, they insist on mentioning - for no apparent reason, and counter to what the FBI knew in advance - that it *might be* foreign disinfo. Probably not. But it might be! Except it wasn't, and all of the people on that list you sent knew it. So they swept it under the rug until after the election, in an affront to the dignity of their very profession.
"Even though they probably aren't"
Are you fucking stupid?
Are you? They are justifying censoring true information here!
ROFL. Yes, you are fucking stupid.
But go ahead with the censorship claims about things that are public, and were public at the time.
This is an admission that they are intentionally misleading their readership about the nature of the information on that laptop. Even though an American person gave it to another American, who leaked it to an American newspaper, they insist on mentioning - for no apparent reason, and counter to what the FBI knew in advance - that it *might be* foreign disinfo. Probably not. But it might be! Except it wasn't, and all of the people on that list you sent knew it. So they swept it under the rug until after the election, in an affront to the dignity of their very profession.
No it isn't.
But go ahead with the censorship claims about things that are public, and were public at the time.