What lie did he tell? Because if you mention the 87 Democrats, you’ve proven you did not read his article. He never said everyone was a Democrat. Just that, out of everyone, there included 87 Dems and 0 Republicans.
There is an entire article above you to read that specifically explains his lies, and provides evidence about them being lies point by point.
Scroll up. Read it.
Also, at no point did uri present evidence that there were 0 republicans, only that he *found* 0 republicans, but the statement he made was that there were 0 republicans.
"When I suggested we had a diversity problem with a score of 87 Democrats and zero Republicans"-Uri
Best not to read views one disagrees with! NPR has a serious problem, and it and its core audience prefer to remain in denial about it.
And that problem is what?
I mean, so far as i know, the only person working at NPR that i have absolute confirmation of them lying to public just quit.
That seems like a good thing. Doesn't it?
What lie did he tell? Because if you mention the 87 Democrats, you’ve proven you did not read his article. He never said everyone was a Democrat. Just that, out of everyone, there included 87 Dems and 0 Republicans.
There is an entire article above you to read that specifically explains his lies, and provides evidence about them being lies point by point.
Scroll up. Read it.
Also, at no point did uri present evidence that there were 0 republicans, only that he *found* 0 republicans, but the statement he made was that there were 0 republicans.
"When I suggested we had a diversity problem with a score of 87 Democrats and zero Republicans"-Uri
Way to take what he said out of context. The context is plenty clear that he wasn't claiming there were no Republicans, only that he didn't find any.
Your own honesty is what you need to focus on first. You have a lot of work to do if you really care about honesty at all.
my cute little troll is still following me, and still doesn't know how to read. :)